While
reading Opening Minds, we thought a lot about the language we use in our
classrooms. We thought about applying
the language to our work with students, especially to help students comprehend
text on a deeper level. After participating in our #CyberPD Twitter
Chat, Johnston’s tweets made us pause
and ask ourselves, “Did we miss the big idea?”
It was the following tweet by Johnston that started us thinking: “… I worry about focusing directly on
language too much. Getting students engaged will change the way you talk with
them.”
This is
more than a chicken v. egg debate. This is linking the why to the how of
effective classroom talk.
Johnston also tweeted, “ When children are engaged you
follow their lead. You don't spend time in controlling talk.”
A sigh
of relief. Ahhh…maybe this will be more
natural than we thought.
If we didn’t get the big idea yet, we reviewed Johnston’s
other tweets. The theme of engagement
became quite clear. The following three
quotes were tweets from Johnston during the #CyberPD Twitter Chat.
“When children are engaged, you don't need to ask
comprehension questions - which would kill engagement.”
“Less instruction improves learning when students are
engaged. They try to solve problems themselves & seek help when they need
it.”
“Engaged students generate strategies and share them with
others who need them. They notice and name and we can just reinforce it”
Amber asked @JohnstonzPeter (Johnston’s twitter
handel): Have you seen shifts by
teachers to more effective talk? What do you think helps make the shift? Johnston replied, “a shift in what they
think they're doing, with whom.” When
asked to elaborate, Johnston tweeted, “Focusing on engagement. Realizing that
students are constantly thinking and theorizing that errors are the result."
Our number one take away from #cyber PD could be summed up
in three words:
Teach For Engagement
No comments:
Post a Comment